China establishes patent open licensing system
For a long time, China's patented technology has had problems such as low commercialization rate, asymmetry of supply and demand information for patent licenses, and insufficient commercialization services. In order to solve these problems, the fourth revision of China's Patent Law introduced a patent open licensing system, which is specifically embodied in the revised Articles 50, 51 and 52. The system stipulates that the patentee can voluntarily declare to CNIPA that the license is open, clarifying the payment method and payment standard of the license fee, which will be announced by CNPIA. During the patent open license period, any unit or individual that is willing to implement the open-licensed patents, may notify the patentee in writing, and after paying the license fee in accordance with the announced licensing fee payment method and standard, the patent implementation license will be obtained.
The patent open licensing system has the following advantages:
1. conducive to promoting the connection between the supply and demand of patented technology, and to promoting the spread and application of patented technology;
2. reducing the difficulty of license negotiation and saving the cost of contract negotiation;
3. reducing legal risks caused by rights defects in patent licensing transactions because open-licensed patents are valid patents recognized by CNIPA, and open-licensing of utility models and design patents requires a patent right evaluation report; and
4. the patent annuity can be reduced or exempted during the implementation period of the open license, which can save the patentee’s maintenance costs of patent rights.
However, because the current Patent Law only provides basic provisions for open licensing, specific supporting provisions are needed to fully tap the advantages of the system when it is actually implemented. The unresolved issues may include the followings:
1. How much annual patent fees can be reduced or exempted for the implementation of open licenses?
2. Whether and how to adjust the license fee during the open license period?
3. Whether a patent can both be open licensed and generally licensed through negotiation by both parties?
4. How to regulate false open licenses for the purpose of reducing or exempting patent annual fees?
In any case, the patent open licensing system is a system that is conducive to the transformation of patent implementation, and both patentees and licensees can benefit from it. Therefore, we recommend that patent holders use this system to evaluate the value of patents as soon as possible after the patent is granted. This is especially so for companies with a certain number of patents. They should evaluate and classify the granted patents, and for example, consider open licensing their patents that are not directly used/intended to be used on their own products so as to save costs and maximize the value of their patents.
By Dang Xiaolin and Li Jianzhong
Part of the public information from our website is from the internet. Reposting of such is intended to spread more information and promote network sharing. They do not represent the opinions or any other suggestions of our website and we are not responsible for their authenticity. Part of the works of our website, which we just edit and upload, are from voluntary contributors. Our website only serves as a communicational platform for such works and therefore bears no responsibility for any copyright issues involved. In case you find any works violating your intellectual property rights, please contact us, so that we may change or remove them in time.
All information provided is for reference only. We do not guarantee the accuracy, validity, timeliness and integrity of the information. Our website and our employees are not directly or indirectly responsible to the users or any other people in any way, for any faults, inaccuracy or errors in delivering any information. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, our website claims that we do not assume liability for any direct, indirect, collateral, consequential, special, punitive or exemplary damages of any user or any other person, incurred by using or failing to use any information or links provided by this website.
- From May 5, 2022, the annuity for the 11th to 15th years of the design patent is RMB 3,000 per year [2022-04-24 10:39]
- Judicial Interpretations of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (Draft for Comment) is released [2021-11-26 14:17]
- The Supreme People’s Court issued the Regulations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Cases Concerning Disputes involving Patents relating to Drugs [2021-07-20 16:50]
- Ranking of patents and granted invention patents of Chinese enterprises in the first three quarters of 2020 [2020-12-02 15:33]
- Shanghai Intellectual Property Court and Shanghai Third Intermediate Court released typical cases in IPR protection [2020-12-02 14:24]
其次,大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一,只不过多轮融资后,大众点评股份占比已变小,且与美团合并之后,大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是,大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后,竞争是市场经济不变的法则,我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖,仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果,就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者,饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干,依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值,赢得了资本信任,收获了用户口碑和行业地位。
其次,大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一,只不过多轮融资后,大众点评股份占比已变小,且与美团合并之后,大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是,大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后,竞争是市场经济不变的法则,我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖,仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果,就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者,饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干,依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值,赢得了资本信任,收获了用户口碑和行业地位。