Patent Infringement Dispute Litigation of Split Type Current Transformer
Heard by: Intermediate People's Court of Ningbo, Zhejiang Province.
Outcome of Trial: The court determined that the patent was infringed and ordered a compensation of RMB 650,000.
Case Facts
Zhejiang Dixsen Electric Co., Ltd. was founded in 1995 and mainly engaged in the manufacturing of high and low-voltage transformers, electrical instruments, and other products. With a high reputation and strong technical strength in the industry, the company owns a number of self-developed patents. This case involved a basic patent for a current transformer. The client entrusted Sanyou to protect their patent after they found infringer on the market.
After being entrusted, Sanyou’s attorneys formulated a detailed and thorough litigation strategy and successfully purchased the allegedly infringing product. The court determined that the patent was infringed and ordered a compensation of RMB 650,000.
Typical Significance
With the strengthening of national intellectual property protection, patentees are also expected to receive higher compensation for damages. However, a patentee also needs to provide ample evidence in order to obtain a higher compensation. In this case, Sanyou attorneys organized and collected evidence from the following five aspects.
1) The plaintiff’s invention patent had strong stability and high market value.
2) The financial data submitted by the defendant showed that it made huge profits.
3) The defendant's infringement was of flagrant circumstances.
4) The defendant infringed in bad faith.
5) It might jeopardize personal safety and harm the public interest.
This case provided a positive reference for how to increase the amount of damage compensation.
支付宝 扫一扫
Part of the public information from our website is from the internet. Reposting of such is intended to spread more information and promote network sharing. They do not represent the opinions or any other suggestions of our website and we are not responsible for their authenticity. Part of the works of our website, which we just edit and upload, are from voluntary contributors. Our website only serves as a communicational platform for such works and therefore bears no responsibility for any copyright issues involved. In case you find any works violating your intellectual property rights, please contact us, so that we may change or remove them in time.
All information provided is for reference only. We do not guarantee the accuracy, validity, timeliness and integrity of the information. Our website and our employees are not directly or indirectly responsible to the users or any other people in any way, for any faults, inaccuracy or errors in delivering any information. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, our website claims that we do not assume liability for any direct, indirect, collateral, consequential, special, punitive or exemplary damages of any user or any other person, incurred by using or failing to use any information or links provided by this website.
- The Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of New Plant Varieties (Draft Amendment) was released [2022-12-23 09:58]
- China’s Intellectual Property Data for 2021 were Released [2022-02-17 16:17]
- Judicial Interpretations of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (Draft for Comment) is released [2021-11-26 14:17]
- Chongqing Intellectual Property Court officially established [2021-07-20 16:39]
- CNIPA defines 5 kinds of "high-value invention patents" [2021-04-19 14:11]
其次，大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一，只不过多轮融资后，大众点评股份占比已变小，且与美团合并之后，大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是，大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后，竞争是市场经济不变的法则，我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖，仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果，就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者，饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干，依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值，赢得了资本信任，收获了用户口碑和行业地位。
其次，大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一，只不过多轮融资后，大众点评股份占比已变小，且与美团合并之后，大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是，大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后，竞争是市场经济不变的法则，我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖，仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果，就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者，饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干，依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值，赢得了资本信任，收获了用户口碑和行业地位。