【双语播报】获赔535万元,法雷奥车前雾灯发明专利侵权案分析
法雷奥照明比利时公司-涉车前雾灯总成发明专利侵权案分析(王坤哲).mp3
Recently, the Shanghai Intellectual PropertyCourt (hereinafter referred to as the Shanghai IP Court) made a first instance judgment on a dispute over the infringement of an invention patent for front fog lamp assembly. The plaintiff, in this case, is Valeo Lighting Belgium, a world-famous auto parts manufacturing company. A lamp company in Zhuhai and an automobile sales company in Shanghai were ordered to stop the infringement, with the former compensating the plaintiff for the economic loss of 5 million RMB and a reasonable expenditure of 350,000 RMB.
近日,上海知识产权法院(以下简称上海知产法院)对这起涉车前雾灯总成发明专利侵权纠纷案作出一审判决,判令珠海某车灯公司、上海某汽车销售公司停止侵权,珠海某车灯公司赔偿原告法雷奥公司经济损失500万元及合理开支35万元。本案的原告为世界知名汽车配件制造公司法雷奥照明比利时公司。
The Shanghai IP Court affirmed that the technical solution used by the alleged infringing product fell within the protection scope of the patent right involved, and both defendants shall bear civil liability for ceasing the infringement and compensating for losses in accordance with the law. In this case, the plaintiff claimed to calculate the damages based on the defendant's profits. Because the defendant, a lamp company in Zhuhai, sells a large number of products and there is no evidence to prove that the company is engaged in infringement, the business profit shall be taken into account when determining the amount of compensation. Since the evidence on file cannot reflect the business profit of the alleged infringing product, the infringing profit of the lamp company in Zhuhai could not be directly calculated. According to the relevant provisions of the patent law, the shanghai IP Court adopted a legal compensation method to determine the amount of compensation, in this case, comprehensively considering the situation of the involved patent, the sales quantity, and sales amount of the alleged infringing products, the gross profit margin and business profit of the defendant company, the gross profit margin of the products of companies in the same industry, the contribution rate of the patent involved in the alleged infringing products, and the period of time during which the infringement took place, etc.
上海知产法院认定被诉侵权产品使用的技术方案落入涉案专利权的保护范围,两被告依法均应承担停止侵权、赔偿损失的民事责任。原告在本案中主张以被告获利计算损害赔偿,因被告珠海某车灯公司销售产品众多,且并无证据证明被告珠海某车灯公司系以侵权为业,故在确定赔偿数额时应以营业利润作为考量因素。由于在案证据并不能反映被诉侵权产品的营业利润,故不能直接计算被告珠海某车灯公司的侵权获利。根据专利法的相关规定,上海知产法院采用法定赔偿方法确定本案的赔偿数额,综合考虑涉案专利情况、被诉侵权产品销售数量及销售金额、被告公司毛利率及营业利润、同行业公司产品毛利率、涉案专利在被诉侵权产品中的贡献率、被告的侵权期间等,酌定本案的赔偿数额。
In the trial of the first instance, the shanghai IP Court ruled that the defendants, a lamp company in Zhuhai and an automobile sales company in Shanghai, shall stop the infringement. The lamp company in Zhuhai was sentenced to compensate the plaintiff, Valeo LightingBelgium, 5 million RMB for the economic loss and 350,000 RMB for reasonable expenses such as lawyer fees, notarization fees, and product purchase fees.
The new patent law, which came into effect on June 1, 2021, raised the upper limit of legal compensation for patent infringement damages from 1 million RMB to 5 million RMB. This case is the first case in which the Shanghai IP Court applied for the maximum compensation after the implementation of the new patent law, which shows that the Chinese government has further strengthened the protection of the IP rights of foreign enterprises.
感谢各位的聆听!
本期双语播报员:三友-王坤哲
本网站的部分公开资料来源于互联网,转载的目的在于传递更多信息及用于网络分享,并不代表本站赞同其观点和对其真实性负责,也不构成任何其他建议。本站部分作品是由自主投稿和发布、编辑整理上传,对此类作品本站仅提供交流平台,不为其版权负责。如果您发现网站上有侵犯您的知识产权的作品,请与我们取得联系,我们会及时修改或删除。
本网站所提供的信息,只供参考之用。本网站不保证信息的准确性、有效性、及时性和完整性。本网站及其雇员一概毋须以任何方式就任何信息传递或传送的失误、不准确或错误,对用户或任何其他人士负任何直接或间接责任。在法律允许的范围内,本网站在此声明,不承担用户或任何人士就使用或未能使用本网站所提供的信息或任何链接所引致的任何直接、间接、附带、从属、特殊、惩罚性或惩戒性的损害赔偿。
- 【友精彩】第十二届中国知识产权年会,三友与您相约济南 [2023-09-19 06:34]
- 【友精彩】三友入选2023年首都知识产权服务行业信用推荐名单 [2023-05-06 15:38]
- 【4·26特刊】世界因创新而精彩,创新因女性而美丽 [2023-05-06 13:55]
- 【友学问】《商标法修订草案》之“关于商标恶意注册申请” [2023-03-20 07:45]
- 【友精彩】2022年度中日韩知识产权国际学术研讨会顺利召开,三友总经理党晓林参会点评 [2023-01-05 10:47]
其次,大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一,只不过多轮融资后,大众点评股份占比已变小,且与美团合并之后,大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是,大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后,竞争是市场经济不变的法则,我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖,仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果,就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者,饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干,依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值,赢得了资本信任,收获了用户口碑和行业地位。
其次,大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一,只不过多轮融资后,大众点评股份占比已变小,且与美团合并之后,大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是,大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后,竞争是市场经济不变的法则,我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖,仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果,就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者,饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干,依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值,赢得了资本信任,收获了用户口碑和行业地位。