【双语播报】2021年最高人民法院知识产权法庭审查趋势及数据（节选）
2021年最高人民法院知识产权法庭审查趋势及数据（节选）.mp3
In 2021, the court accepted 5238 intellectual property and monopoly cases involving technologies with an increase of 1158 cases compared with that of 2020, marking a year-on-year increase of 36.4%.
In2021, the court received 437 new cases involving foreign countries. Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan accounted for 10.1% of the total, with a year-on-year increase of 16.2%.
Trial period - seemed to be longer, The average duration of the trial period for various cases is 134 days.
Of the 2569 civil cases of the second instance which were initiated, there are:576 disputes over infringement of invention patents (marking a rising trend);806 disputes over infringement of utility model patent;213 disputes over patent application right and ownership of patent right (marking arising trend).
Among the 1290 newly received administrative cases of second instance, there are:
457 disputes over rejection and reexamination and 283 disputes over invalidation of invention patent applications (a significant increase);
36 disputes over rejection and reexamination and 234 disputes over invalidation of utility model patent applications (an increasing trend);
3 disputes over rejection and reexamination and 102 disputes over invalidation of design patent application (an increasing trend).
(1) The number of cases continues to grow involving a wider range of technical fields. In 2019, 12 cases of technical secret disputes were accepted, which increased to 44 in 2020 and 79 in 2021.
(2)The legal issues involved are complex and diverse：
Procedural issues mainly involve; jurisdiction disputes, including the place of infringement, the determination of repeated prosecution, and the determination of jurisdiction when the liability for breach of the contract coincides with the liability for infringement.
Disputes over substantive issues include: content and scope of technical secrets、determination of the amount of compensation for infringement of technical secrets and confidentiality measures、infringement of technical secrets、substantial contribution in modifying and improving technical secrets、identificationof whether the technical information of customized products constitutes technical secrets, etc.
（2）涉及的法律问题复杂多样：程序问题主要涉及：管辖权争议，包括侵权行为地、重复起诉情形的认定及违约责任与侵权责任竞合时管辖的确定等。
(3)There has been a marked increase in cases where the amount of compensation was high. Following the five times punitive damages of more than 30 million RMB sentenced in the "Kapo" technical secrets infringement case in 2020, 159 million RMB was awarded in the "Vanillin" technical secrets infringement case.
感谢各位的聆听!
本期双语播报员：三友-王培
支付宝 扫一扫
本网站的部分公开资料来源于互联网，转载的目的在于传递更多信息及用于网络分享，并不代表本站赞同其观点和对其真实性负责，也不构成任何其他建议。本站部分作品是由自主投稿和发布、编辑整理上传，对此类作品本站仅提供交流平台，不为其版权负责。如果您发现网站上有侵犯您的知识产权的作品，请与我们取得联系，我们会及时修改或删除。
本网站所提供的信息，只供参考之用。本网站不保证信息的准确性、有效性、及时性和完整性。本网站及其雇员一概毋须以任何方式就任何信息传递或传送的失误、不准确或错误，对用户或任何其他人士负任何直接或间接责任。在法律允许的范围内，本网站在此声明，不承担用户或任何人士就使用或未能使用本网站所提供的信息或任何链接所引致的任何直接、间接、附带、从属、特殊、惩罚性或惩戒性的损害赔偿。
- 【双语播报】中国商标维权实务讲座分享 [2022-07-08 09:33]
- 【七一表彰】三友荣获“优秀共产党员“、”优秀党务工作者“、”先进基层党组织“以及”支持党建工作先进单位”四项奖项 [2022-07-01 10:24]
- 【案理说】刍议背景技术记载的内容作为申请文件修改依据的条件 [2022-05-10 09:25]
- 北京互联网法院发布涉短视频著作权十件典型案例 [2022-04-24 14:45]
- 2022，元旦快乐！ [2021-12-31 13:48]
其次，大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一，只不过多轮融资后，大众点评股份占比已变小，且与美团合并之后，大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是，大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后，竞争是市场经济不变的法则，我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖，仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果，就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者，饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干，依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值，赢得了资本信任，收获了用户口碑和行业地位。
其次，大众点评仍是饿了么的股东之一，只不过多轮融资后，大众点评股份占比已变小，且与美团合并之后，大众点评将放弃在饿了么的董事席位及投票权。需要特别强调的是，大众点评与我们饿了么原有的合作仍继续进行。 最后，竞争是市场经济不变的法则，我们与美团外卖以及其他所有外卖，仍将维持激烈的竞争关系不变。相互砥砺的结果，就是共同为用户和商户提供极致服务。 作为互联网外卖行业的领导者，饿了么有幸依靠自身的实干，依靠为用户、商户提供独特价值，赢得了资本信任，收获了用户口碑和行业地位。