The Guangdong Provincial High People's Court has released the 2023 Administrative Litigation White Paper and Top 10 Typical Cases. The white paper shows that in 2023, the courts in Guangdong Province received 25365 new administrative cases of first instance, marking a year-on-year decrease of 1.3%; and closed 26029 cases. And 15603 new administrative cases of second instance were received, marking a year-on-year decrease of 11.8%. 43374 new non-litigation cases involving administrative examinations were received, and 43536 cases were concluded, marking a year-on-year decrease of 0.52%.

The attendance rate of administrative officials at all levels in Guangdong Province reached 15000, marking a year-on-year increase of 10.9%. 40083 administrative actions were approved for compulsory execution, with an approval rate of 92.1%.

Top 10 Typical Cases of Administrative Litigation in Guangdong Courts for 2023 Released：

1. A certain asset management company and Chen XX sued the Guangdong Regulatory Bureau of the China Securities Regulatory Commission for confiscating illegal gains and fines.

2. Yang XX sues Nansha District Branch of Guangzhou Public Security Bureau and Nansha District People's Government of Guangzhou for ordering suspension of business for rectification, fines, and administrative reconsideration.

3. Zhao XX sues Shenzhen Market Supervision Administration for Industrial and Commercial Registration.

4. X Precision Industry Co., Ltd. sues the Shaoguan Natural Resources Bureau for administrative dispute resolution.

5. A technology company sues the Dongguan Ecological Environment Bureau for administrative penalties.

6. Case of an economic union suing Foshan Natural Resources Bureau and Yanghe Town People's Government of Gaoming District, Foshan City for non-performance of administrative agreement.

7. Liang sues Deqing County Civil Affairs Bureau for Marriage Registration.

8. Wu X sues Maoming Transportation Bureau for Administrative Penalty.

9. Guangdong X Technology Company sues Jieyang Municipal People's Government for Franchise License.

10. A ceramic company sues the Chao'an District Bureau of Statistics and the Chao'an District People's Government of Chaozhou City for administrative penalties and administrative reconsideration.